lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 8 Apr 2021 20:23:44 +0000
From:   Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
CC:     Ramesh Shanmugasundaram <rashanmu@...il.com>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
        Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 2/5] media: dt-bindings: media: renesas,drif: Convert
 to json-schema

Hi Rob,

thanks for your feedback.

> From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> Sent: 07 April 2021 19:27
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] media: dt-bindings: media: renesas,drif:
> Convert to json-schema
> 
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 7:02 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Fabrizio, Rob,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:53 PM Fabrizio Castro
> > <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com> wrote:
> > > Convert the Renesas DRIF bindings to DT schema and update
> > > MAINTAINERS accordingly.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> >
> > Thanks for your patch!
> >
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,drif.yaml
> >
> > > +  clock-names:
> > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > +    items:
> > > +      - const: fck
> >
> > With latest dt-schema, "make dt_binding_check" complains:
> >
> >     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,drif.yaml:
> > properties:clock-names:maxItems: False schema does not allow 1
> >     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,drif.yaml:
> > ignoring, error in schema: properties: clock-names: maxItems
> 
> Seems this just got applied, and now this error is in linux-next.

I'll send a patch to fix the problem shortly.

Thanks,
Fab

> 
> >
> > Using
> >
> >        clock-names:
> >          const: fck
> >
> > Fixes that.
> >
> > However, I'm wondering why I do not get a complaint about the similar
> > clock/clock-names in
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,lvds.yaml.
> > Because they're part of an else branch?
> 
> Probably. if/then/else schemas have fewer checks as they can be
> incomplete (only additional constraints on the top-level schema).
> 
> Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ