lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 8 Apr 2021 14:03:20 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [next] [arm64] [gpio] BUG: key has not been registered! DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON:

On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 04:21, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:38 AM Naresh Kamboju
> <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > While running kselftest recently added gpio gpio-sim.sh test case the following
> > warning was triggered on Linux next tag 20210330 tag running on arm64 juno
> > and hikey devices.
> >
> > GOOD: next-20210326
> > BAD: next-20210330
> >
> > This is still happening today on Linux next tag 20210407.
>
> Can you add the following
>
>   sysfs_attr_init(attrs[i]);
>
> to the end of the loop in gpio_sim_setup_sysfs()?

Do you mean like this,

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c
index ea17289a869c..5fe67ccf45f7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c
@@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ static int gpio_sim_setup_sysfs(struct gpio_sim_chip *chip)
                dev_attr->store = gpio_sim_sysfs_line_store;

                attrs[i] = &dev_attr->attr;
+               sysfs_attr_init(attrs[i]);
        }

        chip->attr_group.name = "line-ctrl";


>
> If it fixes an issue I'll send a formal patch.

I will build and test this and report here.

- Naresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ