[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210408134347.GE4516@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 14:43:47 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>
Cc: shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-imx@....com,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: imx: add a check for speed_hz before calculating
the clock
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 06:33:47PM +0800, Clark Wang wrote:
> When some drivers use spi to send data, spi_transfer->speed_hz is
> not assigned. If spidev->max_speed_hz is not assigned as well, it
> will cause an error in configuring the clock.
> Add a check for these two values before configuring the clock. An
> error will be returned when they are not assigned.
For the case where the transfer speed is not set __spi_validate() will
take the controller's maximum speed so the controller should just be
able to unconditionally use the transfer's speed. Your issue is
therefore that the controllers are sometimes not setting a maximum
speed which this doesn't seem to fix AFAICT? I'd expect the driver to
be able to work one out based on the input clock.
> struct spi_imx_devtype_data {
> void (*intctrl)(struct spi_imx_data *, int);
> int (*prepare_message)(struct spi_imx_data *, struct spi_message *);
> - int (*prepare_transfer)(struct spi_imx_data *, struct spi_device *,
> - struct spi_transfer *);
> + int (*prepare_transfer)(struct spi_imx_data *, struct spi_device *);
> void (*trigger)(struct spi_imx_data *);
> int (*rx_available)(struct spi_imx_data *);
> void (*reset)(struct spi_imx_data *);
This seems to be a fairly big and surprising refactoring for the
described change. It's quite hard to tie the change to the changelog.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists