[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a845f8e-295b-1445-382c-75277ade45ae@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 16:18:57 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv1 7/7] KVM: unmap guest memory using poisoned pages
On 09.04.21 16:12, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 03:50:42PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> 3. Allow selected users to still grab the pages (esp. KVM to fault them into
>>>> the page tables).
>>>
>>> As long as fault leads to non-present PTEs we are fine. Usespace still may
>>> want to mlock() some of guest memory. There's no reason to prevent this.
>>
>> I'm curious, even get_user_pages() will lead to a present PTE as is, no? So
>> that will need modifications I assume. (although I think it fundamentally
>> differs to the way get_user_pages() works - trigger a fault first, then
>> lookup the PTE in the page tables).
>
> For now, the patch has two step poisoning: first fault in, on the add to
> shadow PTE -- poison. By the time VM has chance to use the page it's
> poisoned and unmapped from the host userspace.
IIRC, this then assumes that while a page is protected, it will remain
mapped into the NPT; because, there is no way to remap into NPT later
because the pages have already been poisoned.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists