lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210409122929.5c2793df@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Apr 2021 12:29:29 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Cc:     Matteo Croce <mcroce@...ux.microsoft.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] page_pool: Allow drivers to hint on SKB
 recycling

On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 22:01:51 +0300 Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 11:56:48AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri,  2 Apr 2021 20:17:31 +0200 Matteo Croce wrote:  
> > > Co-developed-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> > > Co-developed-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...rosoft.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>  
> > 
> > Checkpatch says we need sign-offs from all authors.
> > Especially you since you're posting.  
> 
> Yes it does, we forgot that.  Let me take a chance on this one. 
> The patch is changing the default skb return path and while we've done enough
> testing, I would really prefer this going in on a future -rc1 (assuming we even
> consider merging it), allowing enough time to have wider tests.

Up to you guys. FWIW if you decide to try for 5.13 the missing signoffs
can be posted in replies, no need to repost.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ