linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] page_pool: Allow drivers to hint on SKB recycling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YHC6Y0jSte0fWygK@apalos.home>
Date:   Fri, 9 Apr 2021 23:34:43 +0300
From:   Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Matteo Croce <mcroce@...ux.microsoft.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] page_pool: Allow drivers to hint on SKB
 recycling

On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 12:29:29PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 22:01:51 +0300 Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 11:56:48AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Fri,  2 Apr 2021 20:17:31 +0200 Matteo Croce wrote:  
> > > > Co-developed-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> > > > Co-developed-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...rosoft.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>  
> > > 
> > > Checkpatch says we need sign-offs from all authors.
> > > Especially you since you're posting.  
> > 
> > Yes it does, we forgot that.  Let me take a chance on this one. 
> > The patch is changing the default skb return path and while we've done enough
> > testing, I would really prefer this going in on a future -rc1 (assuming we even
> > consider merging it), allowing enough time to have wider tests.
> 
> Up to you guys. FWIW if you decide to try for 5.13 the missing signoffs
> can be posted in replies, no need to repost.
Thanks! but...
I think I prefer another repost, including mm-people on the list as well (and
fixing SoB's).
I just noticed noone is cc'ed and patch [2/5] adds a line in mm_types.h

/Ilias