[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACPK8Xc5HC7TZ6cUDH6+uHQO1LQCZE0YeENua1sE8nDXs0R2mg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 04:07:41 +0000
From: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
To: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>,
linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Avi Fishman <avifishman70@...il.com>,
Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"Chia-Wei, Wang" <chiawei_wang@...eedtech.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] ipmi: Allow raw access to KCS devices
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 23:47, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2021, at 21:44, Corey Minyard wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:27:46AM +0930, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> > > > 1. It begins with patches 1-5 put together by Chia-Wei, which I've
> > > > rebased on v5.12-rc2. These fix the ASPEED LPC bindings and other
> > > > non-KCS LPC-related ASPEED device drivers in a way that enables the
> > > > SerIRQ patches at the end of the series. With Joel's review I'm hoping
> > > > these 5 can go through the aspeed tree, and that the rest can go through
> > > > the IPMI tree.
> > > >
> > > > Please review!
> > >
> > > Unfortunately the cover letter got detached from the rest of the series.
> > >
> > > Any chance you can take a look at the patches?
> >
> > There were some minor concerns that were unanswered, and there really
> > was no review by others for many of the patches.
>
> Right; I was planning to clean up the minor concerns once I'd received
> some more feedback. I could have done a better job of communicating
> that :)
I'll merge the first five through the aspeed tree this coming merge
window. We have acks from the relevant maintainers.
Arnd: would you prefer that this come as it's own pull request, or as
part of the device tree branch?
Andrew, Corey: once I've got my pull requests out I'll look at
reviewing the rest of the series. Perhaps it would pay to re-send that
hunk of patches Andrew with the nits fixed?
Cheers,
Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists