[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <b718a500-87e9-4958-a15f-56e024837ec8@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 15:09:30 +0930
From: "Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@...id.au>
To: "Joel Stanley" <joel@....id.au>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
"Zev Weiss" <zweiss@...inix.com>
Cc: "Corey Minyard" <minyard@....org>,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
"OpenBMC Maillist" <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"Ryan Chen" <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"Tomer Maimon" <tmaimon77@...il.com>,
linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"Avi Fishman" <avifishman70@...il.com>,
"Patrick Venture" <venture@...gle.com>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Tali Perry" <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"Chia-Wei, Wang" <chiawei_wang@...eedtech.com>,
"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Benjamin Fair" <benjaminfair@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] ipmi: Allow raw access to KCS devices
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021, at 13:37, Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 23:47, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Apr 2021, at 21:44, Corey Minyard wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:27:46AM +0930, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
>
> > > > > 1. It begins with patches 1-5 put together by Chia-Wei, which I've
> > > > > rebased on v5.12-rc2. These fix the ASPEED LPC bindings and other
> > > > > non-KCS LPC-related ASPEED device drivers in a way that enables the
> > > > > SerIRQ patches at the end of the series. With Joel's review I'm hoping
> > > > > these 5 can go through the aspeed tree, and that the rest can go through
> > > > > the IPMI tree.
>
> > > > >
> > > > > Please review!
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately the cover letter got detached from the rest of the series.
> > > >
> > > > Any chance you can take a look at the patches?
> > >
> > > There were some minor concerns that were unanswered, and there really
> > > was no review by others for many of the patches.
> >
> > Right; I was planning to clean up the minor concerns once I'd received
> > some more feedback. I could have done a better job of communicating
> > that :)
>
> I'll merge the first five through the aspeed tree this coming merge
> window. We have acks from the relevant maintainers.
>
> Arnd: would you prefer that this come as it's own pull request, or as
> part of the device tree branch?
>
> Andrew, Corey: once I've got my pull requests out I'll look at
> reviewing the rest of the series. Perhaps it would pay to re-send that
> hunk of patches Andrew with the nits fixed?
Yep; Zev has done some reviews for me so I'll address those, rebase on
your tree once you've sent out the pull-req and send out a v3.
Corey: Are you okay with that for now?
Cheers,
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists