[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW4-DfkDg6txJNfLi2PYVzh-3aPLYE_7tUEZ6WzHEeG9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:11:55 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] serial: sh-sci: Respect deferred probe when
getting IRQ
Hi Günter,
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:58 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> On 4/7/21 3:17 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > With platform_get_irq() and its optional variant it's possible to get
> > a deferred probe error code. Since the commit ed7027fdf4ec ("driver core:
> > platform: Make platform_get_irq_optional() optional") the error code
> > can be distinguished from no IRQ case. With this, rewrite IRQ resource
> > handling in sh-sci driver to follow above and allow to respect deferred
> > probe.
> >
> > Fixes: ed7027fdf4ec ("driver core: platform: Make platform_get_irq_optional() optional")
> > Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>
> This patch alone causes a hard hang early during boot. It works if applied
> together with ed7027fdf4ec. Ultimately that means that ed7027fdf4ec introduces
> a functional change, and will need to be applied very carefully. A cursory
> glance through callers of platform_get_irq_optional() shows that many
> do not handle this correctly: various drivers handle a return value of 0
> as valid interrupt, and others treat errors other than -ENXIO as fatal.
>
> Also, each patch on its own causes failures on sh, which is problematic
> when applying them even as series. See below for an idea how to
> address that.
>
> > ---
> > v2: fixed a typo: i -> 0
> > drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> > index ad2c189e8fc8..574f68ba50ff 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> > @@ -2899,13 +2899,6 @@ static int sci_init_single(struct platform_device *dev,
> > port->mapbase = res->start;
> > sci_port->reg_size = resource_size(res);
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sci_port->irqs); ++i) {
> > - if (i)
> > - sci_port->irqs[i] = platform_get_irq_optional(dev, i);
> > - else
> > - sci_port->irqs[i] = platform_get_irq(dev, i);
> > - }
> > -
> > /* The SCI generates several interrupts. They can be muxed together or
> > * connected to different interrupt lines. In the muxed case only one
> > * interrupt resource is specified as there is only one interrupt ID.
> > @@ -2913,12 +2906,17 @@ static int sci_init_single(struct platform_device *dev,
> > * from the SCI, however those signals might have their own individual
> > * interrupt ID numbers, or muxed together with another interrupt.
> > */
> > + sci_port->irqs[0] = platform_get_irq(dev, 0);
> > if (sci_port->irqs[0] < 0)
> > - return -ENXIO;
> > + return sci_port->irqs[0];
> >
> > - if (sci_port->irqs[1] < 0)
> > - for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sci_port->irqs); i++)
> > + for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sci_port->irqs); ++i) {
> > + sci_port->irqs[i] = platform_get_irq_optional(dev, i);
> > + if (sci_port->irqs[i] < 0)
> > + return sci_port->irqs[i];
> > + if (sci_port->irqs[i] == 0)
> > sci_port->irqs[i] = sci_port->irqs[0];
>
> Since sh never gets -EPROBE_DEFER, the following code can be applied
> on its own and does not depend on ed7027fdf4ec.
Note that the sh-sci driver is also used on ARM32/64 and H8/300.
On ARM, I don't expect GIC interrupts causing -EPROBE_DEFER, though.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists