[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210412073928.1120823-1-suhui@zeku.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:39:28 +0800
From: Hui Su <suhui@...u.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Hui Su <suhui@...u.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: remove the redundant comments
Since the commit 55627e3cd22c ("sched/core: Remove rq->cpu_load[]"),
we don't need this any more.
Signed-off-by: Hui Su <suhui@...u.com>
---
kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 10a1522b1e30..2232022d8561 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -897,11 +897,6 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_uclamp_used);
struct rq {
/* runqueue lock: */
raw_spinlock_t lock;
-
- /*
- * nr_running and cpu_load should be in the same cacheline because
- * remote CPUs use both these fields when doing load calculation.
- */
unsigned int nr_running;
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
unsigned int nr_numa_running;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists