[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9c447fd-d3f5-cb66-b3a9-7f7002594ccc@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:36:07 +0200
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Hui Su <suhui@...u.com>, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: remove the redundant comments
On 12/04/2021 09:39, Hui Su wrote:
> Since the commit 55627e3cd22c ("sched/core: Remove rq->cpu_load[]"),
> we don't need this any more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hui Su <suhui@...u.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 10a1522b1e30..2232022d8561 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -897,11 +897,6 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_uclamp_used);
> struct rq {
> /* runqueue lock: */
> raw_spinlock_t lock;
> -
> - /*
> - * nr_running and cpu_load should be in the same cacheline because
> - * remote CPUs use both these fields when doing load calculation.
> - */
> unsigned int nr_running;
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> unsigned int nr_numa_running;
I forgot to remove this snippet back then. LGTM.
Add a
Fixes: 55627e3cd22c ("sched/core: Remove rq->cpu_load[]")
line.
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists