[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210412212248.GN3@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 00:22:48 +0300
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mitali Borkar <mitaliborkar810@...il.com>
Cc: bingbu.cao@...el.com, tian.shu.qiu@...el.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com, mitali_s@...iitr.ac.in
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] Re: [PATCH 2/6] staging: media: intel-ipu3:
preferred __aligned(size) over __attribute__aligned(size)
Hi Mitali,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 07:59:29PM +0530, Mitali Borkar wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:43:15PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Mitali,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 04:38:59AM +0530, Mitali Borkar wrote:
> > > This patch fixes the warning identified by checkpatch.pl by replacing
> > > __attribute__aligned(size) with __aligned(size)
> >
> > Same comments on this than the 1st patch.
> >
> > It's a staging driver so even if this is a user space header, it's not
> > under include/uapi/linux.
> >
> Sir, I am not able to understandd what you are trying to say in this. As you
> mentioned in patch 1/6, I removed and added header where BIT() macro under
> apprpriate userpace, but what should I modify in this patch?
The comment on the 1st patch and above was a weird way of saying "please
drop patches 1 and 2".
BIT(), __aligned() and __packed are macros in kernel headers that generally
are not available in headers exported for user space consumption.
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists