linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 04/34] dt-bindings: Add bindings for Keem Bay IPC driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABb+yY3kRj2F1ao9A1_+ve5dZm0Q=tThJyu-cVo-cqMjZ+uQ2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:24:41 -0500
From:   Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
To:     mgross@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, markgross@...nel.org,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, bp@...e.de, damien.lemoal@....com,
        dragan.cvetic@...inx.com, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, palmerdabbelt@...gle.com,
        paul.walmsley@...ive.com, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniele Alessandrelli <daniele.alessandrelli@...el.com>,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/34] dt-bindings: Add bindings for Keem Bay IPC driver

On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 2:20 PM mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:01:40PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:22:34PM -0800, mgross@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Daniele Alessandrelli <daniele.alessandrelli@...el.com>
> > >
> > > Add DT binding documentation for the Intel Keem Bay IPC driver, which
> >
> > Bindings are for h/w blocks, not drivers. From a binding perspective, I
> > don't really care what the driver architecture for some OS looks like. I
> > continue to not understand what this h/w looks like. A block diagram
> > would help as would understanding what blocks have multiple clients
> > (mailboxes and xlink in particular).
> I'm working to gather this info.
>
Do I pick the mailbox related patches (and which ones exactly) ?

thanks.