linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 19/34] xlink-core: Add xlink core device tree bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9fb59639-3745-33e7-e89c-c9fb75e9c7c4@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:32:31 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     mgross@...ux.intel.com, markgross@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
        bp@...e.de, damien.lemoal@....com, dragan.cvetic@...inx.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, corbet@....net,
        palmerdabbelt@...gle.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
        peng.fan@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        jassisinghbrar@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Seamus Kelly <seamus.kelly@...el.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 19/34] xlink-core: Add xlink core device tree bindings

On 2/12/21 2:22 PM, mgross@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +# Copyright (c) Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/misc/intel,keembay-xlink.yaml#"
> +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#"
> +
> +title: Intel Keem Bay xlink

Is there a specific reason this is dual licensed?  If so, can you please
include information about the license choice in the next post's cover
letter?

If there is no specific reason for this contribution to be dual
licensed, please make it GPL-2.0 only.