lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1bcedd9-a2d3-55db-1821-af2db27517de@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:14:45 +0200
From:   Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Hui Su <suhui@...u.com>, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: remove the redundant comments

On 13/04/2021 18:28, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:36:07 +0200
> Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com> wrote:

[...]

>> Add a
>>
>>   Fixes: 55627e3cd22c ("sched/core: Remove rq->cpu_load[]")
>>
>> line.
> 
> It's just removing a comment. Should it really need a "Fixes" tag, which
> will cause many people to look at it to determine if it should be
> backported to stable?

I see, in this case let's skip it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ