[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANRm+CwNxcKPKdV4Bxr-5sWJtg_SKZEN5atGJKRyLcVnWVSKSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 15:38:40 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] context_tracking: Split guest_enter/exit_irqoff
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 at 15:35, Christian Borntraeger
<borntraeger@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 13.04.21 09:16, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> [...]
>
> > @@ -145,6 +155,13 @@ static __always_inline void guest_exit_irqoff(void)
> > }
> >
> > #else
> > +static __always_inline void context_guest_enter_irqoff(void)
> > +{
> > + instrumentation_begin();
> > + rcu_virt_note_context_switch(smp_processor_id());
> > + instrumentation_end();
> > +}
> > +
> > static __always_inline void guest_enter_irqoff(void)
> > {
> > /*
> > @@ -155,10 +172,13 @@ static __always_inline void guest_enter_irqoff(void)
> > instrumentation_begin();
> > vtime_account_kernel(current);
> > current->flags |= PF_VCPU;
> > - rcu_virt_note_context_switch(smp_processor_id());
> > instrumentation_end();
> > +
> > + context_guest_enter_irqoff();
>
> So we now do instrumentation_begin 2 times?
Similar to context_guest_enter_irqoff() ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN.
Wanpeng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists