[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4551632e-5584-29f6-68dd-d85fa968858b@de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:48:32 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] context_tracking: Split guest_enter/exit_irqoff
On 13.04.21 09:38, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 at 15:35, Christian Borntraeger
> <borntraeger@...ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 13.04.21 09:16, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> @@ -145,6 +155,13 @@ static __always_inline void guest_exit_irqoff(void)
>>> }
>>>
>>> #else
THis is the else part
>>> +static __always_inline void context_guest_enter_irqoff(void)
>>> +{
>>> + instrumentation_begin();
2nd on
>>> + rcu_virt_note_context_switch(smp_processor_id());
>>> + instrumentation_end();
2nd off
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static __always_inline void guest_enter_irqoff(void)
>>> {
>>> /*
>>> @@ -155,10 +172,13 @@ static __always_inline void guest_enter_irqoff(void)
>>> instrumentation_begin();
first on
>>> vtime_account_kernel(current);
>>> current->flags |= PF_VCPU;
>>> - rcu_virt_note_context_switch(smp_processor_id());
>>> instrumentation_end();
first off
>>> +
>>> + context_guest_enter_irqoff();
here we call the 2nd on and off.
>>
>> So we now do instrumentation_begin 2 times?
>
> Similar to context_guest_enter_irqoff() ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN.
For the
ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN part
context_guest_enter_irqoff()
does not have instrumentation_begin/end.
Or did I miss anything.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists