linux-kernel - Re: Subject: [PATCH v2] staging: media: meson: vdec: declare u32 as static const appropriately

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YHV734NB4flpFjbF@kali>
Date:   Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:39:19 +0530
From:   Mitali Borkar <mitaliborkar810@...il.com>
To:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com, narmstrong@...libre.com,
        mchehab@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        khilman@...libre.com
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, mitali_s@...iitr.ac.in
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH v2] staging: media: meson: vdec: declare u32 as
 static const appropriately

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:26:01AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 13/04/2021 08:27, Mitali Borkar wrote:
> > Declared 32 bit unsigned int as static constant inside a function
> > appropriately.
> > 
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mitali Borkar <mitaliborkar810@...il.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Changes from v1:- Rectified the mistake by declaring u32 as static const
> > properly.
> > 
> >  drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/codec_h264.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/codec_h264.c b/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/codec_h264.c
> > index ea86e9e1c447..80141b89a9f6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/codec_h264.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/codec_h264.c
> > @@ -287,8 +287,8 @@ static void codec_h264_resume(struct amvdec_session *sess)
> >  	struct amvdec_core *core = sess->core;
> >  	struct codec_h264 *h264 = sess->priv;
> >  	u32 mb_width, mb_height, mb_total;
> > -	static const u32[] canvas3 = { ANCO_CANVAS_ADDR, 0 };
> > -	static const u32[] canvas4 = { 24, 0 };
> > +	static const u32 canvas3[] = { ANCO_CANVAS_ADDR, 0 };
> > +	static const u32 canvas4[] = { 24, 0 };
> 
> This is a patch on top of your previous (v1) patch. That won't work
> since the v1 is not merged, you need to make a patch against the current
> mainline code.
>
But Sir, since I have made changes in the code, and committed them, now,
if I open that file, it will contain those changes. Then should I
rewrite the patch body more accurately? 

> Regards,
> 
> 	Hans
> 
> >  
> >  	amvdec_set_canvases(sess, canvas3, canvas4);
> >  
> > 
>