[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210413133753.GA1535744@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 08:37:53 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
thierry.reding@...il.com, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
heiko@...ech.de, lee.jones@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: pwm: add more compatible strings to
pwm-rockchip.yaml
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 22:01:53 +0200, Johan Jonker wrote:
> The compatible strings below are already in use in the Rockchip
> dtsi files, but were somehow never added to a document, so add
>
> "rockchip,rk3328-pwm"
>
> "rockchip,rk3036-pwm", "rockchip,rk2928-pwm"
>
> "rockchip,rk3368-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm"
> "rockchip,rk3399-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm"
>
> "rockchip,px30-pwm", "rockchip,rk3328-pwm"
> "rockchip,rk3308-pwm", "rockchip,rk3328-pwm"
>
> for pwm nodes to pwm-rockchip.yaml.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
> ---
> Note for rob+dt:
> A tag was not added on purpose, because by the change of schema
> for clocks and clock-names I add "rockchip,rk3328-pwm" to
> the "if:", so strictly speaking V1 and (V2) V3 will not be the same.
> Please have a look at it again.
>
> For some SoC nodes this patch serie generates notifications
> for undocumented "interrupts" properties shared between
> PWM channels till there is consensus of what to do with it or
> someone makes a solution for the whole PWM block.
>
> Changed V3:
> fix mistake with compatibles introduced in V2
> Changed V2:
> changed schema for clocks and clock-names
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists