linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ACPI: utils: Capitalize abbreviations in the comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gsSD=4FjtTwi=Op5-rdhTo1KGMSUJ4OirFGUiWueVFCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Apr 2021 15:50:21 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@...ica.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ACPI: utils: Capitalize abbreviations in the comments

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:21 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The DSDT and ACPI should be capitalized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> ---
> v2: split from patch 1 as per Rafael's request
>  drivers/acpi/utils.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> index 60e46efc1bc8..3b54b8fd7396 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static int acpi_dev_match_cb(struct device *dev, const void *data)
>   * Note that if the device is pluggable, it may since have disappeared.
>   *
>   * Note that unlike acpi_dev_found() this function checks the status
> - * of the device. So for devices which are present in the dsdt, but
> + * of the device. So for devices which are present in the DSDT, but
>   * which are disabled (their _STA callback returns 0) this function
>   * will return false.
>   *
> @@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_dev_present);
>
>  /**
>   * acpi_dev_get_next_match_dev - Return the next match of ACPI device
> - * @adev: Pointer to the previous acpi_device matching this @hid, @uid and @hrv
> + * @adev: Pointer to the previous ACPI device matching this @hid, @uid and @hrv
>   * @hid: Hardware ID of the device.
>   * @uid: Unique ID of the device, pass NULL to not check _UID
>   * @hrv: Hardware Revision of the device, pass -1 to not check _HRV
> --

Applied as 5.13 material along with the [1/2], thanks!