[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210413135120.GT7405@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:51:20 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
rds-devel@....oracle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v3 0/2] Introduce rdma_set_min_rnr_timer() and
use it in RDS
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:29:41AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 07:58:47PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 08:43:12PM +0200, Håkon Bugge wrote:
> > > ib_modify_qp() is an expensive operation on some HCAs running
> > > virtualized. This series removes two ib_modify_qp() calls from RDS.
> > >
> > > I am sending this as a v3, even though it is the first sent to
> > > net. This because the IB Core commit has reach v3.
> > >
> > > Håkon Bugge (2):
> > > IB/cma: Introduce rdma_set_min_rnr_timer()
> > > rds: ib: Remove two ib_modify_qp() calls
> >
> > Applied to rdma for-next, thanks
>
> Jason,
>
> It should be
> + WARN_ON(id->qp_type != IB_QPT_RC && id->qp_type != IB_QPT_XRC_TGT);
>
> and not
> + if (WARN_ON(id->qp_type != IB_QPT_RC && id->qp_type != IB_QPT_XRC_TGT))
> + return -EINVAL;
Unless we can completely remove the return code the if statement is a
reasonable way to use the WARN_ON here
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists