linux-kernel - Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in cma_cancel_operation, rdma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <FD5C91B5-8E07-4CB0-A08B-5E0D1E2A3B04@oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:09:29 +0000
From:   Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
CC:     Hao Sun <sunhao.th@...il.com>,
        "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
        OFED mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in cma_cancel_operation, rdma_listen



> On 13 Apr 2021, at 15:44, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:42:43PM +0800, Hao Sun wrote:
>> Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> 于2021年4月13日周二 下午9:34写道：
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:36:41AM +0800, Hao Sun wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>> 
>>>> When using Healer(https://github.com/SunHao-0/healer/tree/dev) to fuzz
>>>> the Linux kernel, I found two use-after-free bugs which have been
>>>> reported a long time ago by Syzbot.
>>>> Although the corresponding patches have been merged into upstream,
>>>> these two bugs can still be triggered easily.
>>>> The original information about Syzbot report can be found here:
>>>> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=8dc0bcd9dd6ec915ba10b3354740eb420884acaa
>>>> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=95f89b8fb9fdc42e28ad586e657fea074e4e719b
>>> 
>>> Then why hasn't syzbot seen this in a year's time? Seems strange
>>> 
>> 
>> Seems strange to me too, but the fact is that the reproduction program
>> in attachment can trigger these two bugs quickly.
> 
> Do you have this in the C format?

How can a commit changing arch m68k provoke a bug when running on x86_64?


Håkon

> 
> Jason