[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgJvJJtd2mpYpx5+zn_hPrSOqGqi-Pxb7e+h+anhsLnQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:19:21 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: ojeda@...nel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@...reload.com>,
Finn Behrens <me@...enk.de>,
Adam Bratschi-Kaye <ark.email@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] Rust: Compiler builtins crate
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:46 AM <ojeda@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> We also need a helpers C source file to contain some forwarders
> to C macros and inlined functions. For the moment, we only need it
> to call the `BUG()` macro, but we will be adding more later.
Not being a Rust person, I can only guess based on random pattern
matching, but this _looks_ like these "panicking intrinsics" panic at
run-time (by calling BUG()).
Is there some way these things could cause built-time link errors
instead, so that if somebody uses 128-bit shifts, or floating point
ops in the rust code, they show up as build failures, not as run-time
ones?
Hmm?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists