[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210415072431.apntpcwrk5hp6zg4@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:54:31 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Jie Deng <jie.deng@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
conghui.chen@...el.com, kblaiech@...lanox.com,
jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
Sergey Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
yu1.wang@...el.com, shuo.a.liu@...el.com,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver
On 15-04-21, 09:21, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > I didn't forget this. It is a very small change. I'm not sure if the
> > maintainer Wolfram
> >
> > has any comments so that I can address them together in one version.
>
> Noted. I'll have a look in the next days.
Now that we were able to catch you, I will use the opportunity to
clarify the doubts I had.
- struct mutex lock in struct virtio_i2c, I don't think this is
required since the core takes care of locking in absence of this.
- Use of I2C_CLASS_DEPRECATED flag, I don't think it is required for
new drivers.
:)
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists