[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210415072823.GB1006@kunai>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:28:23 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Jie Deng <jie.deng@...el.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
conghui.chen@...el.com, kblaiech@...lanox.com,
jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
Sergey Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
yu1.wang@...el.com, shuo.a.liu@...el.com,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver
> Now that we were able to catch you, I will use the opportunity to
> clarify the doubts I had.
>
> - struct mutex lock in struct virtio_i2c, I don't think this is
> required since the core takes care of locking in absence of this.
This is likely correct.
> - Use of I2C_CLASS_DEPRECATED flag, I don't think it is required for
> new drivers.
This is definately correct :)
Let's see if I will have more questions...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists