[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210415072823.GB1006@kunai>
Date:   Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:28:23 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Jie Deng <jie.deng@...el.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        conghui.chen@...el.com, kblaiech@...lanox.com,
        jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
        Sergey Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
        Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        yu1.wang@...el.com, shuo.a.liu@...el.com,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver
> Now that we were able to catch you, I will use the opportunity to
> clarify the doubts I had.
> 
> - struct mutex lock in struct virtio_i2c, I don't think this is
>   required since the core takes care of locking in absence of this.
This is likely correct.
> - Use of I2C_CLASS_DEPRECATED flag, I don't think it is required for
>   new drivers.
This is definately correct :)
Let's see if I will have more questions...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
