linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 11/13] mm/mempolicy: huge-page allocation for many preferred

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 15 Apr 2021 15:41:52 +0800
From:   Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/13] mm/mempolicy: huge-page allocation for many
 preferred

Hi Michal,

Many thanks for reviewing the whole patchset! We will check them.

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:25:34PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Please use hugetlb prefix to make it explicit that this is hugetlb
> related.
> 
> On Wed 17-03-21 11:40:08, Feng Tang wrote:
> > From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
> > 
> > Implement the missing huge page allocation functionality while obeying
> > the preferred node semantics.
> > 
> > This uses a fallback mechanism to try multiple preferred nodes first,
> > and then all other nodes. It cannot use the helper function that was
> > introduced because huge page allocation already has its own helpers and
> > it was more LOC, and effort to try to consolidate that.
> > 
> > The weirdness is MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY can't be called yet because it is
> > part of the UAPI we haven't yet exposed. Instead of make that define
> > global, it's simply changed with the UAPI patch.
> > 
> > [ feng: add NOWARN flag, and skip the direct reclaim to speedup allocation
> >   in some case ]
> > 
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200630212517.308045-12-ben.widawsky@intel.com
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/hugetlb.c   | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  mm/mempolicy.c |  3 ++-
> >  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > index 8fb42c6..9dfbfa3 100644
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_vma(struct hstate *h,
> >  				unsigned long address, int avoid_reserve,
> >  				long chg)
> >  {
> > -	struct page *page;
> > +	struct page *page = NULL;
> >  	struct mempolicy *mpol;
> >  	gfp_t gfp_mask;
> >  	nodemask_t *nodemask;
> > @@ -1126,7 +1126,17 @@ static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_vma(struct hstate *h,
> >  
> >  	gfp_mask = htlb_alloc_mask(h);
> >  	nid = huge_node(vma, address, gfp_mask, &mpol, &nodemask);
> > -	page = dequeue_huge_page_nodemask(h, gfp_mask, nid, nodemask);
> > +	if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) { /* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY */
> 
> Please use MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY explicitly here.
> 
> > +		gfp_t gfp_mask1 = gfp_mask | __GFP_NOWARN;
> > +
> > +		gfp_mask1 &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
> > +		page = dequeue_huge_page_nodemask(h,
> > +				gfp_mask1, nid, nodemask);
> > +		if (!page)
> > +			page = dequeue_huge_page_nodemask(h, gfp_mask, nid, NULL);
> > +	} else {
> > +		page = dequeue_huge_page_nodemask(h, gfp_mask, nid, nodemask);
> > +	}
> >  	if (page && !avoid_reserve && vma_has_reserves(vma, chg)) {
> >  		SetHPageRestoreReserve(page);
> >  		h->resv_huge_pages--;
> 
> __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM handing is not needed here. dequeue_huge_page_nodemask 
> only uses gfp mask to get zone and cpusets constraines. So the above
> should have simply been
> 	if (mpol->mode == MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY) {
> 		page = dequeue_huge_page_nodemask(h, gfp_mask, nid, nodemask);
> 		if (page)
> 			goto got_page;
> 		/* fallback to all nodes */
> 		nodemask = NULL;
> 	}
> 	page = dequeue_huge_page_nodemask(h, gfp_mask, nid, nodemask);
> got_page:
> 	if (page ...)

You are right, no need to change the gfp_mask here.


> > @@ -1883,7 +1893,17 @@ struct page *alloc_buddy_huge_page_with_mpol(struct hstate *h,
> >  	nodemask_t *nodemask;
> >  
> >  	nid = huge_node(vma, addr, gfp_mask, &mpol, &nodemask);
> > -	page = alloc_surplus_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, nodemask);
> > +	if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) { /* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY */
> > +		gfp_t gfp_mask1 = gfp_mask | __GFP_NOWARN;
> > +
> > +		gfp_mask1 &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
> > +		page = alloc_surplus_huge_page(h,
> > +				gfp_mask1, nid, nodemask);
> > +		if (!page)
> > +			alloc_surplus_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, NULL);
> > +	} else {
> > +		page = alloc_surplus_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, nodemask);
> > +	}
> 
> And here similar
> 	if (mpol->mode == MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY) {
> 		page = alloc_surplus_huge_page(h, (gfp_mask | __GFP_NOWARN) & ~(__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM), nodemask);
> 		if (page)
> 			goto got_page;
> 		/* fallback to all nodes */
> 		nodemask = NULL;
> 	}
> 	page = alloc_surplus_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nodemask);
> got_page:
> >  	mpol_cond_put(mpol);
> 
> You can have a dedicated gfp mask here if you prefer of course but I
> calling out MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY explicitly will make the code easier to
> read.

Will follow. The "if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) {
/* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY *a/ " and "MPOL_MAX + 1" will be replaced
in the 12/13 patch.

Thanks,
Feng

> >  	return page;
> -- 
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs