| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210415081717.GC61572@shbuild999.sh.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:17:17 +0800
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/13] mm/mempolicy: Create a page allocator for policy
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:08:19PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 17-03-21 11:40:05, Feng Tang wrote:
> > From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
> >
> > Add a helper function which takes care of handling multiple preferred
> > nodes. It will be called by future patches that need to handle this,
> > specifically VMA based page allocation, and task based page allocation.
> > Huge pages don't quite fit the same pattern because they use different
> > underlying page allocation functions. This consumes the previous
> > interleave policy specific allocation function to make a one stop shop
> > for policy based allocation.
> >
> > With this, MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY's semantic is more like MPOL_PREFERRED
> > that it will first try the preferred node/nodes, and fallback to all
> > other nodes when first try fails. Thanks to Michal Hocko for suggestions
> > on this.
> >
> > For now, only interleaved policy will be used so there should be no
> > functional change yet. However, if bisection points to issues in the
> > next few commits, it was likely the fault of this patch.
>
> I am not sure this is helping much. Let's see in later patches but I
> would keep them separate and rather create a dedicated function for the
> new policy allocation mode.
Thanks for the suggestion, we will rethink the implementations.
- Feng
> > Similar functionality is offered via policy_node() and
> > policy_nodemask(). By themselves however, neither can achieve this
> > fallback style of sets of nodes.
> >
> > [ Feng: for the first try, add NOWARN flag, and skip the direct reclaim
> > to speedup allocation in some case ]
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200630212517.308045-9-ben.widawsky@intel.com
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> > ---
> > mm/mempolicy.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > index d945f29..d21105b 100644
> > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > @@ -2187,22 +2187,60 @@ bool mempolicy_nodemask_intersects(struct task_struct *tsk,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -/* Allocate a page in interleaved policy.
> > - Own path because it needs to do special accounting. */
> > -static struct page *alloc_page_interleave(gfp_t gfp, unsigned order,
> > - unsigned nid)
> > +/* Handle page allocation for all but interleaved policies */
> > +static struct page *alloc_pages_policy(struct mempolicy *pol, gfp_t gfp,
> > + unsigned int order, int preferred_nid)
> > {
> > struct page *page;
> > + gfp_t gfp_mask = gfp;
> >
> > - page = __alloc_pages(gfp, order, nid);
> > - /* skip NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT counter update if numa stats is disabled */
> > - if (!static_branch_likely(&vm_numa_stat_key))
> > + if (pol->mode == MPOL_INTERLEAVE) {
> > + page = __alloc_pages(gfp, order, preferred_nid);
> > + /* skip NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT counter update if numa stats is disabled */
> > + if (!static_branch_likely(&vm_numa_stat_key))
> > + return page;
> > + if (page && page_to_nid(page) == preferred_nid) {
> > + preempt_disable();
> > + __inc_numa_state(page_zone(page), NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT);
> > + preempt_enable();
> > + }
> > return page;
> > - if (page && page_to_nid(page) == nid) {
> > - preempt_disable();
> > - __inc_numa_state(page_zone(page), NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT);
> > - preempt_enable();
> > }
> > +
> > + VM_BUG_ON(preferred_nid != NUMA_NO_NODE);
> > +
> > + preferred_nid = numa_node_id();
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * There is a two pass approach implemented here for
> > + * MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY. In the first pass we try the preferred nodes
> > + * but allow the allocation to fail. The below table explains how
> > + * this is achieved.
> > + *
> > + * | Policy | preferred nid | nodemask |
> > + * |-------------------------------|---------------|------------|
> > + * | MPOL_DEFAULT | local | NULL |
> > + * | MPOL_PREFERRED | best | NULL |
> > + * | MPOL_INTERLEAVE | ERR | ERR |
> > + * | MPOL_BIND | local | pol->nodes |
> > + * | MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY | best | pol->nodes |
> > + * | MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY (round 2) | local | NULL |
> > + * +-------------------------------+---------------+------------+
> > + */
> > + if (pol->mode == MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY) {
> > + gfp_mask |= __GFP_NOWARN;
> > +
> > + /* Skip direct reclaim, as there will be a second try */
> > + gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + page = __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_mask, order,
> > + policy_node(gfp, pol, preferred_nid),
> > + policy_nodemask(gfp, pol));
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(!page && pol->mode == MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY))
> > + page = __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp, order, preferred_nid, NULL);
> > +
> > return page;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2244,8 +2282,8 @@ alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp, int order, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > unsigned nid;
> >
> > nid = interleave_nid(pol, vma, addr, PAGE_SHIFT + order);
> > + page = alloc_pages_policy(pol, gfp, order, nid);
> > mpol_cond_put(pol);
> > - page = alloc_page_interleave(gfp, order, nid);
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2329,7 +2367,8 @@ struct page *alloc_pages_current(gfp_t gfp, unsigned order)
> > * nor system default_policy
> > */
> > if (pol->mode == MPOL_INTERLEAVE)
> > - page = alloc_page_interleave(gfp, order, interleave_nodes(pol));
> > + page = alloc_pages_policy(pol, gfp, order,
> > + interleave_nodes(pol));
> > else
> > page = __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp, order,
> > policy_node(gfp, pol, numa_node_id()),
> > --
> > 2.7.4
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists