[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fszrn7sx.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:47:26 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
nathan@...nel.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] s390: Get rid of oprofile leftovers
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:38:52 +0100,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 02:44:07PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > perf_pmu_name() and perf_num_counters() are unused. Drop them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/s390/kernel/perf_event.c | 21 ---------------------
> > 1 file changed, 21 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> ...or do you want me to pick this up and route via the s390 tree(?).
Either way work for me, but I just want to make sure the last patch
doesn't get applied before the previous ones.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists