lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:12:10 +0200
From:   Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        nathan@...nel.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] s390: Get rid of oprofile leftovers

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:47:26AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:38:52 +0100,
> Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 02:44:07PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > perf_pmu_name() and perf_num_counters() are unused. Drop them.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/s390/kernel/perf_event.c | 21 ---------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
> > 
> > ...or do you want me to pick this up and route via the s390 tree(?).
> 
> Either way work for me, but I just want to make sure the last patch
> doesn't get applied before the previous ones.

Ok, I applied this one to the s390 tree. Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ