lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210416173203.GE7604@twin.jikos.cz>
Date:   Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:32:03 +0200
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:     Khaled ROMDHANI <khaledromdhani216@...il.com>
Cc:     clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com, dsterba@...e.com,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next] fs/btrfs: Fix uninitialized variable

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 02:06:04PM +0100, Khaled ROMDHANI wrote:
> The variable zone is not initialized. It
> may causes a failed assertion.

Failed assertion means the 2nd one checking that the result still fits
to 32bit type. That would mean that none of the cases were hit, but all
callers pass valid values.

It would be better to add a default: case to catch that explicitly,
though hitting that is considered 'will not happen'.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ