[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <161866014365.29796.9238636476613418213.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:49:03 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Ali Saidi" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@...zon.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/urgent] locking/qrwlock: Fix ordering in
queued_write_lock_slowpath()
The following commit has been merged into the locking/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 84a24bf8c52e66b7ac89ada5e3cfbe72d65c1896
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/84a24bf8c52e66b7ac89ada5e3cfbe72d65c1896
Author: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@...zon.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:27:11
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 13:40:50 +02:00
locking/qrwlock: Fix ordering in queued_write_lock_slowpath()
While this code is executed with the wait_lock held, a reader can
acquire the lock without holding wait_lock. The writer side loops
checking the value with the atomic_cond_read_acquire(), but only truly
acquires the lock when the compare-and-exchange is completed
successfully which isn’t ordered. This exposes the window between the
acquire and the cmpxchg to an A-B-A problem which allows reads
following the lock acquisition to observe values speculatively before
the write lock is truly acquired.
We've seen a problem in epoll where the reader does a xchg while
holding the read lock, but the writer can see a value change out from
under it.
Writer | Reader
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ep_scan_ready_list() |
|- write_lock_irq() |
|- queued_write_lock_slowpath() |
|- atomic_cond_read_acquire() |
| read_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags);
--> (observes value before unlock) | chain_epi_lockless()
| | epi->next = xchg(&ep->ovflist, epi);
| | read_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->lock, flags);
| |
| atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed() |
|-- READ_ONCE(ep->ovflist); |
A core can order the read of the ovflist ahead of the
atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(). Switching the cmpxchg to use acquire
semantics addresses this issue at which point the atomic_cond_read can
be switched to use relaxed semantics.
Fixes: b519b56e378ee ("locking/qrwlock: Use atomic_cond_read_acquire() when spinning in qrwlock")
Signed-off-by: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@...zon.com>
[peterz: use try_cmpxchg()]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@....com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@....com>
---
kernel/locking/qrwlock.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
index 4786dd2..b94f383 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
@@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_read_lock_slowpath);
*/
void queued_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
{
+ int cnts;
+
/* Put the writer into the wait queue */
arch_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
@@ -73,9 +75,8 @@ void queued_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
/* When no more readers or writers, set the locked flag */
do {
- atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->cnts, VAL == _QW_WAITING);
- } while (atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->cnts, _QW_WAITING,
- _QW_LOCKED) != _QW_WAITING);
+ cnts = atomic_cond_read_relaxed(&lock->cnts, VAL == _QW_WAITING);
+ } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->cnts, &cnts, _QW_LOCKED));
unlock:
arch_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists