[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eef8sdtd.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:15:26 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, john.stultz@...aro.org,
sboyd@...nel.org, corbet@....net, Mark.Rutland@....com,
maz@...nel.org, kernel-team@...com, neeraju@...eaurora.org,
ak@...ux.intel.com, Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected
On Sat, Apr 17 2021 at 15:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 02:24:23PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> I so wish we could just delete all of this horror instead of making it
>> more horrible.
>
> Revisit deleting it in five years if there are no issues, whatever
> "issue" might mean in this context? Five years should give time for
> this to propagate to the enterprise distros.
That does not help with the fact that the broken hardware will still be
around in 5 years from now. Which is what prevents me from deleting the
whole watchdog muck ...
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists