linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 17 Apr 2021 16:40:28 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, john.stultz@...aro.org,
        sboyd@...nel.org, corbet@....net, Mark.Rutland@....com,
        maz@...nel.org, kernel-team@...com, neeraju@...eaurora.org,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long
 delays detected

On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 01:15:26AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17 2021 at 15:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 02:24:23PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> I so wish we could just delete all of this horror instead of making it
> >> more horrible.
> >
> > Revisit deleting it in five years if there are no issues, whatever
> > "issue" might mean in this context?  Five years should give time for
> > this to propagate to the enterprise distros.
> 
> That does not help with the fact that the broken hardware will still be
> around in 5 years from now. Which is what prevents me from deleting the
> whole watchdog muck ...

Ouch!  Sigh...

							Thanx, Paul