[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210419181111.5eb582e8@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:11:11 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: "fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"jeyu@...nel.org" <jeyu@...nel.org>,
"mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com" <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"chris@...is-wilson.co.uk" <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
"yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com" <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] tracing: Enable tracepoints via module parameters
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:54:13 +0000
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> [ drop Rusty, add Jessica and Emmanuel ]
Probably could have kept Jessica on as she's the module maintainer.
>
> On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 23:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:32:10 +0930
Wow, this is coming back from the dead! No thread rests in peace!
> > Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> writes:
> > > > But the thing about this that bothers me is that there's no way
> > > > to say,
> > > > "Enable all tracepoints in this module on load". I would like a
> > > > way to
> > > > do that, but I don't know of a way to do that without modifying
> > > > the
> > > > module code. Have any ideas? Basically, I would love to have:
> > > >
> > > > insmod foo tracepoints=all
> > > >
> > > > or something and have all tracepoints enabled.
> > >
> > > "without modifying the module code"? Why? The code isn't that
> > > scary,
> > > and this seems useful.
> >
> > I'm not afraid of the code, I'm afraid of you ;-) I hear you have
> > killer puppies.
> >
> >
> > OK, then when I get some time, I may cook something up.
"when I get some time" HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! That was what? 8 years ago!
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -- Steve
>
> Revive an old thread...
I'll say!
>
> Steven, did you ever end up with a solution to the "enable tracing at
> module load" problem?
For tracepoints, no. For function tracing, yes!
>
> I see some people getting admonished to use ftrace over dev_dbg() [1],
> but one of the features that keeps dev_dbg() proliferating is its
> generic "$mod_name.dyndbg=" module parameter support for selective
> debug enabling at boot / module-load.
>
> It would be useful to be able to do
> /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control enabling for tracepoints, but
> also module::function_name patterns for "got here" style debugging. I'd
> be happy to help with this, but wanted to understand where you left
> things.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/YHRFy3aq%2FgB7Vde6@kroah.com/
I don't think I did anything with trace events, I'll have to dig deeper.
But today you have this:
# cd /sys/kernel/tracing
# rmmod bridge
# echo ':mod:bridge' > set_ftrace_filter
# cat set_ftrace_filter
:mod:bridge
# echo function > current_tracer
# cat trace
# tracer: function
#
# entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 0/0 #P:8
#
# _-----=> irqs-off
# / _----=> need-resched
# | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
# || / _--=> preempt-depth
# ||| / delay
# TASK-PID CPU# |||| TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
# | | | |||| | |
# modprobe bridge
# cat set_ftrace_filter
br_switchdev_event [bridge]
br_device_event [bridge]
br_net_exit [bridge]
br_boolopt_get [bridge]
br_boolopt_multi_get [bridge]
br_opt_toggle [bridge]
br_boolopt_toggle [bridge]
br_boolopt_multi_toggle [bridge]
br_dev_set_multicast_list [bridge]
br_get_link_ksettings [bridge]
[..]
# cat trace
# tracer: function
#
# entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 10/10 #P:8
#
# _-----=> irqs-off
# / _----=> need-resched
# | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
# || / _--=> preempt-depth
# ||| / delay
# TASK-PID CPU# |||| TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
# | | | |||| | |
modprobe-2364 [006] .... 12929.869510: br_init <-do_one_initcall
modprobe-2364 [006] .... 12929.869513: br_fdb_init <-br_init
modprobe-2364 [006] .... 12929.869522: br_device_event <-call_netdevice_register_net_notifiers
modprobe-2364 [006] .... 12929.869522: br_device_event <-call_netdevice_register_net_notifiers
modprobe-2364 [006] .... 12929.869522: br_device_event <-call_netdevice_register_net_notifiers
modprobe-2364 [006] .... 12929.869522: br_device_event <-call_netdevice_register_net_notifiers
modprobe-2364 [006] .... 12929.869523: br_device_event <-call_netdevice_register_net_notifiers
modprobe-2364 [006] .... 12929.869523: br_device_event <-call_netdevice_register_net_notifiers
modprobe-2364 [006] .... 12929.869524: br_netlink_init <-br_init
modprobe-2364 [006] .... 12929.869524: br_mdb_init <-br_netlink_init
So yes, function tracing now allows setting a filter to trace only the
functions for a given module, and if that module is not yet loaded, it
stores the filter until it is.
To do something similar for tracepoints, I think we still need to add it as
a module parameter.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists