[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7137db63-20ea-29b2-7b8e-e2edd0c42bdd@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:09:54 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND][next] rxrpc: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
Hi all,
Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 3/5/21 03:19, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> through to the next case.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> ---
> net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
> index 41671af6b33f..2b5f89713e36 100644
> --- a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
> +++ b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
> @@ -471,6 +471,7 @@ static int rxrpc_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
> switch (rx->sk.sk_state) {
> case RXRPC_UNBOUND:
> rx->sk.sk_state = RXRPC_CLIENT_UNBOUND;
> + break;
> case RXRPC_CLIENT_UNBOUND:
> case RXRPC_CLIENT_BOUND:
> break;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists