lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 20 Apr 2021 13:33:31 -0700
From:   Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Sanjay Kumar <sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.11 007/122] dmaengine: idxd: Fix clobbering of SWERR
 overflow bit on writeback


On 4/20/2021 1:13 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Current code blindly writes over the SWERR and the OVERFLOW bits. Write
>> back the bits actually read instead so the driver avoids clobbering the
>> OVERFLOW bit that comes after the register is read.
> I believe this is incorrect. Changelog explains that we need to
> preserve bits in the register...

The code is correct, but I guess maybe badly explained by me. The 
IDXD_SWERR_ACK mask is IDXD_SWERR_VALID | IDXD_SWERR_OVERFLOW. When we 
do write 1 to clear, we want to AND the register value that was read 
with the mask so that we don't blindly clear the overflow bit under the 
scenario where we read the register and then another error comes in and 
set the overflow bit while we are in the interrupt handler.


>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/idxd/irq.c b/drivers/dma/idxd/irq.c
>> index a60ca11a5784..f1463fc58112 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/idxd/irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/idxd/irq.c
>> @@ -124,7 +124,9 @@ static int process_misc_interrupts(struct idxd_device *idxd, u32 cause)
>>   		for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
>>   			idxd->sw_err.bits[i] = ioread64(idxd->reg_base +
>>   					IDXD_SWERR_OFFSET + i * sizeof(u64));
>> -		iowrite64(IDXD_SWERR_ACK, idxd->reg_base + IDXD_SWERR_OFFSET);
>> +
>> +		iowrite64(idxd->sw_err.bits[0] & IDXD_SWERR_ACK,
>> +			  idxd->reg_base + IDXD_SWERR_OFFSET);
> ...but that is not what the code does.
>
> I suspect it should be
>
>> +		iowrite64(idxd->sw_err.bits[0] | IDXD_SWERR_ACK,
>> +			  idxd->reg_base + IDXD_SWERR_OFFSET);
> Best regards,
> 								Pavel
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ