linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 1/6] fs: provide unlocked helper for freeze

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210420120335.GA3604224@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 20 Apr 2021 13:03:35 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     rafael@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, bvanassche@....org,
        jeyu@...nel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
        keescook@...omium.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...force.de, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/6] fs: provide unlocked helper for freeze_super()

On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 12:10:21AM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> freeze_super() holds a write lock, however we wish to also enable
> callers which already hold the write lock. To do this provide a helper
> and make freeze_super() use it. This way, all that freeze_super() does
> now is lock handling and active count management.

Can we take a step back and think about this a bit more?

freeze_super() has three callers:

 1) freeze_bdev
 2) ioctl_fsfreeze
 3) freeze_store (in gfs2)

The first gets its reference from get_active_super, and is the only
caller of get_active_super.  So IMHO we should just not drop the lock
in get_active_super and directly call the unlocked version.

The other two really should just call grab_super to get an active
reference and s_umount.

In other words: I don't think we need both variants, just move the
locking and s_active acquisition out of free_super.  Same for the
thaw side.