[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210420124626.GB3604224@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 13:46:26 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, bvanassche@....org,
jeyu@...nel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
keescook@...omium.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...force.de, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 4/6] fs: distinguish between user initiated freeze and
kernel initiated freeze
Wouldn't it be simpler to just add a new flag to signal a kernel
initiated freeze, or even better the exact reason (suspend) instead of
overloading the state machine?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists