[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210420143727.GP3@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 17:37:27 +0300
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...ux.intel.com>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, rajatja@...gle.com, grundler@...omium.org,
tfiga@...omium.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND v2] iommu/vt-d: Use passthrough mode for the Intel IPUs
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 02:55:33PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 01:56:40PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 06:34:26PM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote:
> > > On 4/20/21 6:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:48:33AM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > This misses the changelog from v1 followed by the explanation why resent.
> > > >
> > > I noticed there was a typo in the recipient list:
> > > stable.vger.kernel.org -> stable@...r.kernel.org
> > >
> > > no code change for resent.
> >
> > When you're submitting a patch and want it reach the stable kernels, you'll
> > need to add a Cc tag:
> >
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> >
> > But not actually add the address to cc. I dropped stable@...r address from
> > distribution.
>
> Does it really matter?
Usually aligning what you're doing with
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst is not a bad idea.
--
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists