linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND v2] iommu/vt-d: Use passthrough mode for the Intel IPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YH7rQbDzQAlY5Z7R@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Apr 2021 17:54:57 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
        baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, rajatja@...gle.com, grundler@...omium.org,
        tfiga@...omium.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND v2] iommu/vt-d: Use passthrough mode for the Intel IPUs

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 05:37:27PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 02:55:33PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 01:56:40PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 06:34:26PM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote:
> > > > On 4/20/21 6:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:48:33AM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote:
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > > > This misses the changelog from v1 followed by the explanation why resent.
> > > > > 
> > > > I noticed there was a typo in the recipient list:
> > > > stable.vger.kernel.org -> stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > > 
> > > > no code change for resent.
> > > 
> > > When you're submitting a patch and want it reach the stable kernels, you'll
> > > need to add a Cc tag:
> > > 
> > > 	Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > 
> > > But not actually add the address to cc. I dropped stable@...r address from
> > > distribution.
> > 
> > Does it really matter?
> 
> Usually aligning what you're doing with
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst is not a bad idea.

True, my point is that technically both ways will give the same result, no?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko