lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:58:56 +0300
From:   Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs: proc.rst: meminfo: briefly describe gaps in
 memory accounting

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 03:57:07PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 20-04-21 14:24:30, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 03:13:54PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > Add a paragraph that explains that it may happen that the counters in
> > > /proc/meminfo do not add up to the overall memory usage.
> > 
> > ... that is, the sum may be lower because memory is allocated for other
> > purposes that is not reported here, right?
> 
> yes. Many direct page allocator users are not accounted in any of the
> existing counters.

Does virtio_balloon dereserve special mention?

>From inside VM memory borrowing looks like one giant memory leak resulting
in support tickets (not that people who file them read internal kernel
documentation...)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ