linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] 4.14 backports of fixes for "CoW after fork() issue"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJuCfpFfRq8TYs78BvXWriVNm4hf1+o_rX7OUGF=5Hdjcpg30g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:17:03 -0700
From:   Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
        Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] 4.14 backports of fixes for "CoW after fork() issue"

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 2:05 PM Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Suren,
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 01:01:34PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > Peter, you mentioned https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/10/439 patch to
> > distinguish real writes vs enforced COW read requests, however I also
> > see that you had a later version of this patch here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1286506/. Which one should I
> > backport? Or is it not needed in the absence of uffd-wp support in the
> > earlier kernels?
>
> Sorry I have no ability to evaluate the rest... but according to Linus's
> previous reply, my understanding is that it is not needed, not to mention it's
> not upstreamed too.

Thanks! Then I'll send the backports for 17839856fd58 alone and if
more backports are needed I'll post followup patches.
Cheers,
Suren.

>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Peter Xu
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@...roid.com.
>