lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:56:16 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Scull <ascull@...gle.com>,
        David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>,
        Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: build perf support only when enabled

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:49:01 +0100,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> 
> The perf_num_counters() function is only defined when CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
> is enabled:
> 
> arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c: In function 'kvm_perf_init':
> arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c:58:43: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_num_counters'; did you mean 'dec_mm_counter'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    58 |         if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PMU) && perf_num_counters() > 0
>       |                                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Use conditional compilation to disable this feature entirely when
> CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS is disabled in the host.
> 
> Fixes: 6b5b368fccd7 ("KVM: arm64: Turn kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3() into a static key")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> Not sure if this is the correct symbol to check for, but this is
> one way to avoid the build failure.

I think a better way is to get rid of perf_num_counters() entirely,
see [1]. If someone acks the second and last patches, I'll even take
the whole series in (nudge nudge...).

Thanks,

	M.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210414134409.1266357-1-maz@kernel.org

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ