linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: build perf support only when enabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:28:12 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Scull <ascull@...gle.com>,
        David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>,
        Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: build perf support only when enabled

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:56 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:49:01 +0100, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> I think a better way is to get rid of perf_num_counters() entirely,
> see [1]. If someone acks the second and last patches, I'll even take
> the whole series in (nudge nudge...).

Makes sense. I like your diffstat, too.

       Arnd