[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a26F1+9XJqHtqO5S0dwTjBhV8Z+0J1r_D69y9h84qyY7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:28:12 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
Andrew Scull <ascull@...gle.com>,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: build perf support only when enabled
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:56 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:49:01 +0100, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> I think a better way is to get rid of perf_num_counters() entirely,
> see [1]. If someone acks the second and last patches, I'll even take
> the whole series in (nudge nudge...).
Makes sense. I like your diffstat, too.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists