[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210421140553.GA2268573@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:05:53 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 059/190] Revert "RDMA/srpt: Remove unnecessary assertion
in srpt_queue_response"
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:02:47AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 02:58:54PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This reverts commit 9f48db0d4a08624bb9ba847ea40c8abad753b396.
> >
> > Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad
> > faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known
> > malicious" changes. The result of these submissions can be found in a
> > paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
> > entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing
> > Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University
> > of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota).
> >
> > Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from
> > the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if
> > they actually are a valid fix. Until that work is complete, remove this
> > change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the
> > codebase.
> >
> > Cc: https
> > Cc: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>
> > Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> I think this one is fine
Sorry, I realize that is unclear. I mean I don't see a reason to
revert this patch.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists