linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 04/34] dt-bindings: Add bindings for Keem Bay IPC driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:05:51 -0500
From:   Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
To:     mgross@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, markgross@...nel.org,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, bp@...e.de, damien.lemoal@....com,
        dragan.cvetic@...inx.com, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, palmerdabbelt@...gle.com,
        paul.walmsley@...ive.com, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniele Alessandrelli <daniele.alessandrelli@...el.com>,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/34] dt-bindings: Add bindings for Keem Bay IPC driver

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 8:55 AM mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 03:14:59PM -0700, mark gross wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 04:24:41PM -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 2:20 PM mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:01:40PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:22:34PM -0800, mgross@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> > > > > > From: Daniele Alessandrelli <daniele.alessandrelli@...el.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Add DT binding documentation for the Intel Keem Bay IPC driver, which
> > > > >
> > > > > Bindings are for h/w blocks, not drivers. From a binding perspective, I
> > > > > don't really care what the driver architecture for some OS looks like. I
> > > > > continue to not understand what this h/w looks like. A block diagram
> > > > > would help as would understanding what blocks have multiple clients
> > > > > (mailboxes and xlink in particular).
> > > > I'm working to gather this info.
> > > >
> > > Do I pick the mailbox related patches (and which ones exactly) ?
> >
> > v6-0002-dt-bindings-mailbox-Add-Intel-VPU-IPC-mailbox-bin.patch
> > and
> > v6-0003-mailbox-vpu-ipc-mailbox-Add-support-for-Intel-VPU.patch
> >
> Sorry for the confusion and delay.  It seems there are some internal requests
> to change the name of this part of the VPU driver stack to avoid possible future
> namespace collisions.
>
> We will rename the vpu-ipc-mailbox with something more specific to KMB on the
> next posting.  That looks like will have to be against v5.13-rc1 at this point.
> Sigh.
>
Ok, I will dequeue the patches.

-j