[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0736599f9266375908e4f79de09fe5eda6d4f183.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:29:28 +0000
From: "Alessandrelli, Daniele" <daniele.alessandrelli@...el.com>
To: "jassisinghbrar@...il.com" <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
"mgross@...ux.intel.com" <mgross@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "dragan.cvetic@...inx.com" <dragan.cvetic@...inx.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"markgross@...nel.org" <markgross@...nel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"damien.lemoal@....com" <damien.lemoal@....com>,
"bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"paul.walmsley@...ive.com" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"peng.fan@....com" <peng.fan@....com>,
"palmerdabbelt@...gle.com" <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/34] dt-bindings: Add bindings for Keem Bay IPC
driver
On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 09:05 -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 8:55 AM mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 03:14:59PM -0700, mark gross wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 04:24:41PM -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 2:20 PM mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:01:40PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:22:34PM -0800, mgross@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> > > > > > > From: Daniele Alessandrelli <daniele.alessandrelli@...el.com>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Add DT binding documentation for the Intel Keem Bay IPC driver, which
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bindings are for h/w blocks, not drivers. From a binding perspective, I
> > > > > > don't really care what the driver architecture for some OS looks like. I
> > > > > > continue to not understand what this h/w looks like. A block diagram
> > > > > > would help as would understanding what blocks have multiple clients
> > > > > > (mailboxes and xlink in particular).
> > > > > I'm working to gather this info.
> > > > >
> > > > Do I pick the mailbox related patches (and which ones exactly) ?
> > >
> > > v6-0002-dt-bindings-mailbox-Add-Intel-VPU-IPC-mailbox-bin.patch
> > > and
> > > v6-0003-mailbox-vpu-ipc-mailbox-Add-support-for-Intel-VPU.patch
> > >
> > Sorry for the confusion and delay. It seems there are some internal requests
> > to change the name of this part of the VPU driver stack to avoid possible future
> > namespace collisions.
> >
> > We will rename the vpu-ipc-mailbox with something more specific to KMB on the
> > next posting. That looks like will have to be against v5.13-rc1 at this point.
> > Sigh.
> >
> Ok, I will dequeue the patches.
I actually have the renamed driver ready (the new name is keembay-ipc-
mailbox, to align it with the other drivers in the series).
Jassi, I can send the two updated patches as a separate patchset if you
have time to re-review them and, in case pick them. Would that be okay
with you? Or is it too late for that?
>
> -j
Powered by blists - more mailing lists