linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add USB related nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=Vzx29E6hH+L8rZyyrOjt2JLzS8ho1Cym6bNY6gt5dO9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:38:02 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@...eaurora.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux USB List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Manu Gautam <mgautam@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add USB related nodes

Hi,


On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:34 AM Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:05:31PM +0530, Sandeep Maheswaram wrote:
> > Add nodes for DWC3 USB controller, QMP and HS USB PHYs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@...eaurora.org>
> > ---
>
> What changes with respect to v1? Please always include a change log for
> versions > 1

It looks like this was here:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/1619112931-2144-1-git-send-email-sanm@codeaurora.org/

...which I guess is a "cover letter", though it's not really formatted
properly (it should usually be listed as "patch 0" in the series) and
also cover letters are discouraged for singleton patches like this.
Also: even when history is added to a cover letter it's usually
friendly to reviewers to also include it after-the-cut in your patch.

-Doug