linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add multiprocessor wake-up support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210422220113.GG7021@zn.tnic>
Date:   Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:01:13 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Rafael J Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ica.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add multiprocessor wake-up support

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 02:47:05PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> Add multiprocessor wakeup support using MADT ACPI table for x86
> platforms. It uses mailbox based mechanism to wake up the APs. You
> can get more details about the ACPI table and mailbox protocol in
> Guest-Host-Communication Interface (GHCI) for Intel Trust Domain
> Extensions (Intel TDX) specification document (sec 4.1)
> 
> https://software.intel.com/content/dam/develop/external/us/en/documents/intel-tdx-guest-hypervisor-communication-interface.pdf
> 
> Changes since v1:
>  * Removed signoff from Rob and Erik.

For the future: please do not resend your patchset immediately but give
reviewers time to have a look at it.

Your current patchset comprises of only 3 patches - now imagine if it
were, 15, or 20 or more? Now also imagine if you were not the only one
submitter who would resend immediately... you'd soon have maintainers
drowning in email - not that they don't do so already anyway.

While waiting, you could read

Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst

for example.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette