linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add multiprocessor wake-up support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54c5642c-f82c-e89c-2969-ad48358bfcaf@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:03:41 -0700
From:   "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Rafael J Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ica.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add multiprocessor wake-up support



On 4/22/21 3:01 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 02:47:05PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>> Add multiprocessor wakeup support using MADT ACPI table for x86
>> platforms. It uses mailbox based mechanism to wake up the APs. You
>> can get more details about the ACPI table and mailbox protocol in
>> Guest-Host-Communication Interface (GHCI) for Intel Trust Domain
>> Extensions (Intel TDX) specification document (sec 4.1)
>>
>> https://software.intel.com/content/dam/develop/external/us/en/documents/intel-tdx-guest-hypervisor-communication-interface.pdf
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>>   * Removed signoff from Rob and Erik.
> 
> For the future: please do not resend your patchset immediately but give
> reviewers time to have a look at it.
> 
> Your current patchset comprises of only 3 patches - now imagine if it
> were, 15, or 20 or more? Now also imagine if you were not the only one
> submitter who would resend immediately... you'd soon have maintainers
> drowning in email - not that they don't do so already anyway.
> 
> While waiting, you could read
> 
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst

Sorry for the trouble. I will keep it in mind for next submission.

> 
> for example.
> 
> Thx.
> 

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer